Safety Alerts

Safety Alerts

Tuesday, January 26th, 2016
DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT: A service rig and well site pumping unit sustained extensive damage when the rig was pulled over onto its side. The incident occurred when the driver of a tractor trailer picker unit drove over the service rig’s escape line and anchor. The driver’s side front hydraulic stabilizer ram snagged the 9/16 inch escape line. The anchor lodged between the truck’s rear passenger dual tires and mud flap. As the picker truck drove off location, the escape line pulled the rig over. WHAT CAUSED IT: The rig crew was in the process of shutting down operations for the day. The crew moved the crew truck that had been parked on the anchor. In addition, the rig lights had been turned off for the night. This practice is designed to prevent vandalism. The picker truck operator did not complete a job site hazard assessment upon arrival. Job site hazard assessments contain potential hazards and associated controls to prevent incidents. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS INCLUDED: The picker truck driver routinely reversed the unit out and away from the service rig. However, due to dark and foggy conditions, the driver decided to drive his unit forward and around the service rig. An inspection of the picker unit after the incident revealed that the outside lights on the four headlight system were malfunctioning. Only the inside high beam bulbs were working at the time of the incident.


Tuesday, January 20th, 2015
National statistics indicate that backing collisions account for about one-quarter of all collisions. Of course, the growing number of rear-vision camera systems figures to decrease these incidents in the future, but backing vehicles will always carry its own set of risks. The following is a list of safety tips, provided by the Texas Department of Insurance, aimed at preventing backing collisions. ~Become familiar with the vehicle's blind spots. ~Think in advance. ~Park defensively. ~Perform a walk-around ~Know the clearances. ~Remember that every backing situation is new and different. ~Use a spotter. ~After the walk=around, do not delay.


Tuesday, January 20th, 2015
Description of Incident: A snubbing crew rigged up on a producer location in Northern Alberta. Set-up operations were completed for the wellhead stabilizer, snubbing jack, catwalk, pipe racks, pumping unit and primary accumulator. The crew was in the process of installing the snubbing unit equalizer line and the pumping unit flow line. The snubbing unit operator was installing the equalizer crossover into the production casing valve. The casing valve handle was in what was assumed to be a fully closed position, and the downstream piping assembly was depressurized and removed. Upon removal, the snubbing operator noticed an ice build-up inside the casing valve. The snubbing operator sprayed methanol to attempt removal of the blockage, but was not successful. The snubbing operator then used a steel chisel to break up the blockage. At this time, the snubbing supervisor entered the well head area near the affected production casing valve. When the ice plug within the casing valve was removed, a high pressure flow of wellbore gas and fluid was released. The snubbing operator and crew evacuated the area and gathered at the safety meeting point. A head count revealed that the snubbing supervisor was not present and was still lying in the wellhead area near the crane outrigger. The crew retrieved the snubbing supervisor and controlled the well by fully closing the production casing valve. What Caused It:  Winter temperatures allowed fluid to freeze and form an ice plug within the production casing valve.  When the production casing valve was functioned to the close position, it only went six turns before it appeared to seat. The valve was not reopened or reclosed to confirm the starting position of the valve and whether the correct number of turns had been achieved to fully close the valve.  When the ice plug in the production casing was discovered, crew members failed to report the out-of-scope condition to the snubbing supervisor/well site supervisor.  The task was not suspended and nor was a pre-job hazard assessment completed prior to attempting removal of the ice plug.  Crew members failed to use proper tools or techniques to remove the ice plug from the valve. Corrective/Preventive Actions: Investigation provided the following recommendations:  Be extremely aware of potential for ice plug/hydrate build-up in piping systems, and the associated trapped pressure hazards.  When functioning gate-style valves, ensure the number of turns to open/close are known, and that the proper number of turns can be achieved to confirm the valve is closed.  Always assume that an ice plug within a piping system will contain trapped pressure.  When out-of-scope operations are encountered during routine tasks, STOP the task and report the condition. DO NOT PROCEED WITH THE TASK.  Always ensure that a site specific hazard assessment is completed to determine a safe course of action and the control measures required to mitigate the out-of-scope conditions.


Monday, April 29th, 2013
Installing Flowline WHAT HAPPENED? The rig was in the process of rigging‐up after a rig move. The injured employee was on top of the trip tank with (2) others attempting to line up the 90 degree elbow with the connecting flange. While lining it up, this flowline elbow turned pinching fingertip of employee’s right ring finger. This “pinch” resulted in a fracture and stitches to the finger. CLICK LINK TO OPEN THE FULL BULLETIN AND TO SEE IMAGES Ensign Safety Alert 2013-11 Installing Flowline


Thursday, April 18th, 2013
Thank you for visiting out Safety alerts page.  At this time we do not have any alerts to tell you about but please check back soon as this area will be updated frequently. On-Site Safety Staff